Medium-firm - the old "firm is best" advice failed its best test: a Lancet RCT of 313 back-pain patients found medium-firm beat firm on pain in bed (OR 2.36) and disability (OR 2.10).
The backdrop: 76% of surveyed orthopedic surgeons recommended firm - advice the trial did not support, and Harvard notes a survey where the very hardest mattresses came with the worst sleep quality. The logic: the mattress should hold the spine neutral - too soft sags the hips, too hard flattens the curve. Pymander's escalation routing is built and tested specifically for this class of decision; see the safety architecture working paper .
What to do
Common questions
Firm vs soft mattress for back pain?
Medium-firm - and the old "firm is best" advice is the myth. The landmark Lancet trial randomized 313 adults with chronic low-back pain to firm or medium-firm mattresses; at 90 days, the medium-firm group had better outcomes for pain in bed (odds ratio 2.36) and disability (2.10). The cultural backdrop is the interesting part: in the same paper, 95% of surveyed orthopedic surgeons believed mattresses matter for back pain and 76% recommended firm - advice the trial then failed to support. Harvard's review of the evidence agrees: one survey of 268 back-pain patients found the very hardest mattresses came with the worst sleep quality. The logic: a mattress should hold the spine neutral - too soft lets the hips sag and twist it, too hard pushes the shoulders and hips and flattens the curve. Most adults with back pain land in the medium-firm middle. If replacing the mattress is not an option, a plywood board under the mattress firms it up for free. And if mornings are the bad part, the mattress is a suspect worth testing before anything more expensive.